Things that go bump in the night – Paranormal Activity review

Paranormal Activity – Starring Katie Featherston and Micah Sloat. Directed by Oren Peli. Rated M. By Simon Miraudo.

Upon leaving the cinema at the conclusion of Oren Peli’s Paranormal Activity, I noted two things. The first: I had just taken part in one of the most enjoyable cinema-going experiences of my life. The second: While the film was expertly made and intensely frightening, it was perhaps not as disturbing as many had stated. And then I went to bed. I say “went to bed” and not “went to sleep” for obvious reasons. Several weeks later, with bags under my eyes and a general sense of unease in my own bedroom, I acknowledge that Paranormal Activity is one of the most terrifying films ever made. I usually try to abstain from such hyperbole, but the lack of zzz’s speaks for itself.

The concept is simple. Micah (Micah Sloat) and Katie (Katie Featherston), a young couple “engaged to be engaged”, have recently moved in together. However, despite dating for almost three years, Katie neglected to tell her boyfriend that she has been haunted by some sort of ghostly entity since she was a little girl. Oh, and that the ghostly entity has followed her to their new digs. It hadn’t been a major problem before, but lately the haunting has become more and more frequent. Micah purchases a camera which he sets up at the foot of their bed every night to record any, ahem, paranormal activity. He thinks the footage will be cool and kind of funny, just like Candid Camera. Instead, it turns out to be creepy and truly disturbing. Just like Candid Camera.

An opening title card thanks the families of Micah Sloat and Katie Featherston, as well as the San Diego Police Department for releasing this video footage. There are no closing credits besides a single slide of copyright information. Every other moment of the film is presented from the perspective of Micah’s resilient camera, including the minutiae of their daily life and visits from a (frankly, unhelpful) psychic. The reality established by director Peli is absolving and believable, thanks primarily to the performances of Sloat and Featherston, who seem to be truly terrified throughout the film. I’m not sure what it was like on the set during filming, but based on their performances, Sloat and Featherston might well have seen the devil himself.

For this film to work, the cinematography needs to seem amateurish. After all, how good would you be at framing a scene when you’re running down the stairs trying to find your missing partner? However, don’t mistake the shaky-handy-cam for amateur filmmaking. Peli, making his feature film debut, shows off some neat tricks that directors with multi-million dollar budgets have trouble pulling off. He understands the basic building blocks of fear; bumps in the night, shadows, Ouija boards, mysterious footsteps, and even just being in the dark. This is Horror Cinema 101. However, Paranormal Activity never feels derivative. It is as if Peli has reverse-engineered everything he finds scary in movies and re-enacted them on a shoestring budget. Now they feel real and all the more terrifying.

By placing the camera in a stationary position on a tripod at the foot of the bed (which is where it stays for most of the film), Peli boxes the audience into this claustrophobic bedroom. On a big screen, you simply do not know where to look. Concentrate too long on the door at the left of the frame and you might miss out on some action on the other side of the room. Conversely, if you are hoping to look away from any spooky stuff, the only respite you can find will be the inside of your eyelids. Peli teases the audience expertly. Scenes remain silent and still; not for long, but long enough to make you sweat. The terror of anticipation and its abrupt release, particularly in the final scene, is exhilarating. I had been sitting so still in the cinema seat, that when I finally got up to leave, my head swam with endorphins. The next morning, my leg and arm muscles seized up.

The film’s closest stylistic relative is The Blair Witch Project, which I personally still find scary but has been the butt of some virulent backlash in recent years. I will say that Paranormal Activity is far scarier than The Blair Witch Project. While Blair Witch teased the audience with ambiguity, Peli’s film shows us what to be afraid of. As the couple go to bed each night, they are subjected to increasingly disturbing ghostly torment. At first they hear a rustling noise downstairs; then their bedroom door simply creaks back and forth; then … it gets much worse. Let me just say this. When a psychic suggests you call a demonologist, you should really call a demonologist.

The story behind Paranormal Activity is almost as captivating as the film itself. It’s been parroted incessantly at this point. The film was shot over seven days in Peli’s very own home in 2006 on a budget of only $11,000. It sold to Paramount/DreamWorks for approximately $300,000 in 2008. It was finally released this year to box office receipts of $100 million plus. Whether or not Peli, Featherston or Sloat will see much of this coin is unknown, but at least they can claim to have the most widely seen audition tape in history. Each of these three talented individuals will get (or at the very least, deserve) a lot of work based on Paranormal Activity. Theirs is the scariest film of the year and certainly a cinematic experience that will remain etched in my memory. Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go get some sleep.


Check out my other reviews here.

10 Responses to “Things that go bump in the night – Paranormal Activity review”

  1. Agree with everything in your review!I saw this film over a month ago and I'm still a bit afraid of being alone & in the dark in my own home…I think the reason it has stuck with me, is the fact that it's set in an ordinary suburban home. Never being able to see the offending spirit, only hear it, makes it even creepier!The two actors were also very convincing as a couple, they had great chemistry. Although I wish that I had not watched the trailer before seeing the film. It gives away a huge plot point that I was waiting for it the whole movie. Kind of ruined the ending for me.Sidenote: I have a manhole right outside my bedroom door, which after seeing Paranomal activity, I now quickly run past everytime I go to bed.

  2. Are you serious? This movie was the biggest load of garbage I've seen this year! Bad story, bad ending and NOT scary at all – and what was with the blatant Exorcist rip off halfway through??! At most 1/5 for me.

  3. Amazing review. Pretty much everything I've been saying about this movie, but said even better.A door in the house blew shut last night and while I didn't jump completely out of my skin, I did get the creeps wondering if there was something standing over my bed!

  4. Aw thanks Angell!You think that's scary? My girlfriend is a sleeptalker…

  5. To the second commenter – I'm assuming you watched the screener that was 'floating around' before it comes out in cinemas tomorrow.I'll just say that I have seen both that version and the cinema version this week and I can say the version in cinemas is definitely better than the screener.The 'exorcist scene' that happens half way in the version you saw isn't actually in the cinema version.The ending is also different (i.e. better) in the cinema version. If you're curious, you can read about the differences in PA's Wikipedia page.Do yourself a favour and check out the cinema version, you may be pleasantly surprised.Great review, I enjoyed it too.

  6. I saw both Blair Witch when it came out and more recently Paranomal Activity and to say both of them were boring is an understatement. I have nothing against movies of this genre, in fact I love a good scare, but these movies left me cold…and not in a spooky wayI went to bed after seeing the movie and slept well. I hear various knocks and creaks at night as the house settles. I have a door that creaks and suddenly opens when not closed properly and the wind is blowing, but this movie didn't make me think that there are entities out there to get me.Sorry, this movie rates 1/10 for me

  7. Sorry Simon – This film was terrible. Inane dialogue poorly constructed story arc. Drivel.1/5

  8. not worth seeing in cinema's. Ending was stupid, only a couple of scary bits and they wernt that scary… blair witch was much better for those who like this style of movie.

  9. scary as hell! i slept with the lights on last night and i have not done that since i was a little girl..'szq'

  10. >i couldn't agree with you more.i still watch this movie sometimes (alone in my room with minimal light possible) and it still scares me so much.rare movie. it deserves it's place right now.sorry for my bad english..

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: